Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • Sign up
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Mysk🇨🇦🇩🇪
Mysk🇨🇦🇩🇪
@mysk@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 20 hours ago

This can be interpreted in such a broad manner that even HTTPS could be considered a hostile act of “end-to-end” encryption 🇬🇧

NoToDigitalID:
BREAKING: Under British and UK Legislation anyone using or developing end-to-end encryption is now a “hostile actor”

#privacy #infosec

Engagement in Hostile Activity

Since hostile activity does not require any knowledge or tasking by a
foreign state*30, the phenomenon of double-ignorance could arise. A person may be engaged in hostile activity if they do something which, unknown to them threatens, national security and which is in the interests of another State, also entirely in the dark. For example:


The developer of an app, whose selling point is end-to-end encryption which would make it more difficult for UK security and intelligence agencies to monitor communications. It is a reasonable assumption that this would be in the interests of a foreign state even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage.
Engagement in Hostile Activity Since hostile activity does not require any knowledge or tasking by a foreign state*30, the phenomenon of double-ignorance could arise. A person may be engaged in hostile activity if they do something which, unknown to them threatens, national security and which is in the interests of another State, also entirely in the dark. For example: The developer of an app, whose selling point is end-to-end encryption which would make it more difficult for UK security and intelligence agencies to monitor communications. It is a reasonable assumption that this would be in the interests of a foreign state even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage.
Engagement in Hostile Activity Since hostile activity does not require any knowledge or tasking by a foreign state*30, the phenomenon of double-ignorance could arise. A person may be engaged in hostile activity if they do something which, unknown to them threatens, national security and which is in the interests of another State, also entirely in the dark. For example: The developer of an app, whose selling point is end-to-end encryption which would make it more difficult for UK security and intelligence agencies to monitor communications. It is a reasonable assumption that this would be in the interests of a foreign state even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block

Bonfire social

This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes

Bonfire social: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in Create account
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct